SEC v. Musk (2018) - 'funding secured' statements
Settled
Current position. The matter was resolved by settlement without admission or denial of the SEC's allegations; Tesla's 2026 proxy states there is no restriction on Musk serving as an officer or director.[1, 2, 3, 4]
- Authority
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Status date
- 2019-04-26
History
- 2018-08-07 Musk posted on Twitter that he was considering taking Tesla private at $420 and that funding was secured.
- 2018-09-27 SEC sued Musk in the Southern District of New York (No. 1:18-cv-08865) alleging false and misleading statements.
- 2018-09-29 SEC announced settlement: Musk and Tesla each to pay $20 million; Musk to step down as Tesla chairman for three years; no admission or denial.
- 2018-10-16 Court entered final judgment on the settlement.
- 2019-04-26 Settlement amended.
In re Tesla, Inc. Securities Litigation - 'funding secured' shareholder class action
Closed
Current position. The jury verdict that Musk and Tesla were not liable stands after the Ninth Circuit's November 2024 ruling.[5, 6, 7]
- Authority
- U.S. federal district court, San Francisco (Judge Edward Chen); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Status date
- 2024-11-06
History
- 2023-02-03 Jury found Musk and Tesla not liable on shareholders' claims over the August 2018 tweets.
- 2024-11-06 Ninth Circuit affirmed denial of a new trial, leaving the verdict in place.
Tornetta v. Musk / In re Tesla, Inc. Derivative Litigation - 2018 CEO performance award
Civil judgment
Current position. The 2018 award is reinstated, with $1 nominal damages, following the Delaware Supreme Court's December 2025 decision and the March 2026 amended final judgment.[8, 9, 10, 11, 12]
- Authority
- Delaware Court of Chancery; Delaware Supreme Court
- Status date
- 2026-03-18
History
- 2018-01 Tesla board granted Musk a 10-year performance stock option award (303,960,630 shares as stated in Tesla's 10-K/A, exercise price $23.34).
- 2022-11 Five-day trial held in the Court of Chancery (C.A. No. 2018-0408).
- 2024-01-30 Court of Chancery post-trial opinion found the grant not entirely fair and ordered rescission.
- 2024-06-13 Tesla stockholders voted again to approve the 2018 award.
- 2024-12-02 Court of Chancery denied defendants' motion to revise based on the stockholder vote and awarded plaintiff's counsel $345 million in fees.
- 2025-12-19 Delaware Supreme Court (per curiam, en banc) reversed the rescission remedy, reinstated the 2018 award, awarded $1 nominal damages and reduced the fee award to a quantum meruit basis with a four-times multiplier; it did not rule on liability or ratification.
- 2026-03-18 Court of Chancery entered an Amended Final Order and Judgment awarding plaintiff's counsel approximately $65 million in fees, costs and interest.
SEC v. Musk (2025) - late disclosure of Twitter stake
Settled
Current position. The case was resolved by a court-approved consent settlement under which the Musk trust pays a $1.5 million penalty without admitting or denying the allegations.[13, 14, 15, 16, 17]
- Authority
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- Status date
- 2026-07-08
History
- 2025-01-14 SEC sued Musk (No. 1:25-cv-00105) alleging he failed to timely file a beneficial ownership report for his Twitter stake in 2022, in violation of Exchange Act Section 13(d).
- 2026-05-04 SEC filed an amended complaint adding the Elon Musk Revocable Trust and moved for a consent judgment with a $1.5 million penalty against the Trust, without admitting or denying; Musk personally to be dismissed.
- 2026-07-08 Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan approved the consent judgment against the Trust, accepting the settlement 'despite its significant misgivings' (as quoted by Bloomberg).
Pampena v. Musk - Twitter shareholder class action over May 2022 statements
On appeal
Current position. A partial civil judgment against Musk is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit as of Tesla's October 2026 proxy statement.[4, 18, 19]
- Authority
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Status date
- 2026-07-30
History
- 2026-03-20 Jury found two May 2022 statements by Musk about his pending Twitter purchase to be false and misleading in violation of securities law.
- 2026-04-03 Court entered a partial judgment against Musk in favour of a class of investors who sold Twitter equity between 13 May and 4 October 2022.
- 2026-07-06 Court granted Musk judgment as a matter of law on one of the two statements and denied the motion otherwise.
- 2026-07-30 Musk appealed to the Ninth Circuit.
Sources
- Elon Musk Charged With Securities Fraud for Misleading Tweets (Press Release 2018-219)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2018-09-27, primary source
- Complaint, SEC v. Elon Musk, No. 1:18-cv-08865 (S.D.N.Y.)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2018-09-27, primary source
- Elon Musk Settles SEC Fraud Charges; Tesla Charged With and Resolves Securities Law Charge (Press Release 2018-226)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2018-09-29, primary source
- Tesla, Inc. 2026 Proxy Statement (Form DEF 14A)Tesla, Inc. / U.S. SEC EDGAR, 2026-10, primary source
- Elon Musk found not liable in trial over 2018 Tesla take-private tweets (Reuters)Reuters, via Kitco, 2023-02-03, secondary source
- 9th Circ. Says No New Trial For Tesla Investors' SuitLaw360, 2024-11-06, secondary source
- Court upholds verdict clearing Elon Musk and Tesla over 2018 'funding secured' tweetDrive Tesla Canada (citing Reuters), 2024-11, secondary source
- In re Tesla, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Delaware Supreme Court opinion (per curiam)Delaware Supreme Court (copy hosted by Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann), 2025-12-19, primary source
- Delaware Supreme Court Reverses the Remedy Applied by the Court of Chancery in In re Tesla, Inc. Derivative LitigationAkin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, 2025-12, secondary source
- Delaware Reinstates Musk's Pay Package, Slashes $345 Million Fee AwardGibson, Dunn & Crutcher, 2025-12, secondary source
- Tesla (Tornetta v. Musk) case pageBernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann (plaintiff's counsel), secondary source
- Tesla, Inc. Form 10-K/A for fiscal year 2025 (Amendment No. 1)Tesla, Inc. / U.S. SEC EDGAR, 2026, primary source
- Litigation Release No. 26219: SEC v. Elon MuskU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2025-01-14, primary source
- Litigation Release No. 26548: Elon Musk and Elon Musk Revocable Trust Dated July 22, 2003U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-05-04, primary source
- US judge approves Elon Musk settlement with SEC despite misgivings, 'red flags' (Reuters)Reuters, via The Star, 2026-07-08, secondary source
- U.S. Judge Allows SEC-Musk Deal Despite 'Significant Misgivings' (Bloomberg)Bloomberg, via CPA Practice Advisor, 2026-07-09, secondary source
- Judge approves Elon Musk's SEC settlement over Twitter disclosures despite 'red flags'Fortune, 2026-07-09, secondary source
- US jury finds Elon Musk misled Twitter shareholders (AFP)AFP, via Eyewitness News, 2026-03-21, secondary source
- Elon Musk misled Twitter investors ahead of acquisition, jury saysFox Business, 2026-03-20, secondary source
Change history
- 2026-10-26 Record published.
Spotted an error? Request a correction with a source that shows the correct position.